i was bored....
1. original
2. re-edit
3. re-edit #2
1
2
3
i was bored....
1. original
2. re-edit
3. re-edit #2
original looks better to me.
:idb:
1 ... to bright in #3
GECKO SQUAD MEMBER
MSS RACING REPRESENTA.....
the saga continues....
numero uno
Original looks really good but the 2nd looks a lot more realistic. I don't know what you're doing with the third one hah
I like the first, that blue in the sky makes the picture just pop
number one
#2 for me. like you said #1 looks fake in some area's and #3 looks like my old pictures lol...........
#2 because the road is darker but the sky and trees need a lil more saturation..
number two is the best imo.
I like the 1st pics car and shadowing on the car and the 2nd pics back ground... ?? I guess lol
Dont rush me bish, Im workin on it. LOL. But I absolutely suck at it
Im gonna go with #1
one is the best overall composition
Num-er Won!
Peek-a-boo mofucka what now?!
Gonna have to go with 2.
original
Mainstream Performance
i say #2. IMO in #1 the trees take a little to much focus from the car
honestly i think number 2.... in the first the car looks a little fake especially from the front tire back...
I agree that #2 is the best. Btw, is this Ryan's new whip?
#1 imo. I like the bright green trees.
4.
///M-Sport Coupe + VTEC
prob has RE30's gay
2 definitely 2, loooks more...... realistic
CANT STOP WHAT YOU CANT CATCH
:idb::boobies:I EAT PUSSY FOR REPS! LOL :boobies::idb:
original seems pretty saturated. i didnt know you swap out your skys that often. second re-edit is hella contrasted.
i'm a whore
HF
hmm i dunno man..the contrast just seems abit weird..even on the original..the backround just seem real bright and light. just my opinion tho
riding low is like a religion